 |
C O L U M N S
Caste as social capital
Why have the Gounders, Nadars,
the Marwaris and Katchis done so well.
The metropolitan elite and rootless experts have concluded
that caste is bad. They have made it so that every Indian
is expected to feel guilty at the mention of caste.
Internationally, caste is a convenient stick to flay
anything Indian, its religions, customs, culture.
But the caste system is undeniably a valuable social
capital, which provides a cushion for individuals and
families to deal with society and the state. The Western
model of atomising every individual to a single element
in a right-based system and forcing the individual to
have a direct link with the state has destroyed families
and erased communities. Every person stands alone, stark
naked, with only rights as his imaginary clothes to
deal directly with the state.
While attacking the caste system, Indian intellectuals
have borrowed the Western right-based concept of reservation,
or affirmative action. In doing so, they have overlooked
an extraordinary contribution of the caste system, in
consolidating business and entrepreneurship in India,
particularly in the last fifty years. The World Bank,
for example, suggests that the remarkable growth of
Tirupur is due to coordinated caste-based efforts of
the Gounders, many of who are not even matriculates.
“Since 1985,” says the World Bank’s World Development
Report, “Tirupur has become a hotbed of economic activity
in the production of knitted garments. By the 1990s,
with high growth rates of exports, Tirupur was a world
leader in the knitted garment industry. The success
of this industry is striking. This is particularly so
as the production of knitted garments is capital-intensive,
and the state banking monopoly had been ineffective
at targeting capital funds to efficient entrepreneurs,
especially at the levels necessary to sustain Tirupur’s
high growth rates.”
“What is behind this story of development? The needed
capital was raised within the Gounder community, a caste
relegated to land-based activities, relying on community
and family network. Those with capital in the Gounder
community transfer it to others in the community through
long-established informal credit institutions and rotating
savings and credit associations. These networks were
viewed as more reliable in transmitting information
and enforcing contracts than the banking and legal systems
that offered weak protection of creditor rights.”
The amount of networking and contract enforcement mechanisms
available with caste institutions has not been fully
studied, despite the striking success of Tirupur. The
same is true of the Nadar community in Virudhunagar
area entrenched in the matches and printing industries.
On the other hand, large amounts of literature are available
on Marwaris, Sindhis, Katchis, Patels, etc, and the
global networks they have created. But the point that
is often still missed is that, in a financial sense,
caste provides the edge in risk taking, since failure
is recognised, condoned, and sometimes even encouraged
by the caste group.
The firmest caste-entrepreneurship linkage was established
by the 1998 economic census conducted by the Central
Statistical Organisation (CSO), and it showed the other
backward castes (OBCs), scheduled tribes (STs) and scheduled
castes (SCs) well in the saddle. The census was vast,
covering 30.35 million enterprises engaged in economic
activities other than crop production and plantation.
It dealt with own account enterprises and establishments,
including an enterprise employing at least one hired
worker. It covered private profit and non-profit institutions,
cooperatives, and all economic activities, including
the management of temples and dharamsalas.
What stood out about the census was that it discovered
the amazing nature of so-called backward caste entrepreneurs
(see table below for details). As much as half of all
enterprises were owned by SCs/ STs/ OBCs in the rural
areas and nearly thirty-eight per cent in the urban
areas. The enterprises included manufacturing, construction,
trade, hotel, restaurant, transport, finance and business,
and other services.
Social Group of Owners of the Enterprises [%]
Item
|
Rural
|
Urban
|
Combined |
|